The next
incarnation
When we set up the artist retreat, we chose to do so “under
the radar,” so to speak. We understood the keen interest in the house and felt
that “word of mouth” would be sufficient. We never advertised. Indeed, it was
not easy to find out about the house for the first few years; if an artist
tracked us down, we could be pretty sure the interest was genuine. We wanted to
know everyone who stayed there, so direct, personal contact was preferred.
Our approach tended towards what is called “the sharing
economy.” We charged no fee, but we were grateful for any gifts artists were
willing to give, depending on how long they stayed and their means. And we did small-scale,
community-based fund-raising. As the number of artists staying increased,
gradually, the financial commitment required of each owner decreased, but it
was never eliminated entirely. Residents in the community also became directly
involved with the house and took pride in having this kind of endeavour in the
village. They welcomed the many artists who stayed and visited.
Afternoon with Binnie Brennan at the EB House.
(Photo by Brenda Barry)
Any such endeavour, regardless of the “model,” is labour
intensive and involves a lot of communication. Such a modus operandi required someone on the ground at all times. I
agreed to be the administrator for the house and within a couple of years, this
work took up a great deal of my time. I did all this work gratis, because the
agreement specifically stated that the administration, to be done by the
owners, would not be paid.1
The Elizabeth Bishop Centenary in 2011 brought an additional
surge of interest and activity. By that time the retreat was established and
respected, with a hopeful belief among many that it would go on in perpetuity.
But a decade brings a lot of change. As the tenth anniversary of our ownership
approached, it became clear that this wonderful endeavour had a finite lifespan,
at least as it was then constituted. For myself, I realized that I could not
continue to administer the house, essentially a full-time job, without
compensation; but the owners were not in a position to add a paid administrator
to the budget, without ramping up the fund-raising. Reluctantly, we decided to
put the house on the market. Initially, we listed the house with Oceans and
Orchards Realty (http://www.novascotiaproperty.info/)
in May 2014, with an asking price of $130,000. We closed the retreat in
September 2014.
A year passed without any serious offers. With income from
the retreat and fund-raising no longer coming in, the majority of the owners
decided that the house had become, in the words of one of them, an “oppressive”
financial “burden” and had to be sold quickly. In June 2015 the price was
dropped to $109,500. In July the price was dropped again, to $99,500. In August
a new realtor was chosen (http://remaxtruro.ca/listings/571/8740-hwy-2)
and the price was dropped again to $79,000. In September, the price was dropped
to $69,000 and in November it dropped to $59,900. We are still waiting for a buyer.2
The future of the
Elizabeth Bishop House
The sale of the house will not stop pilgrims from visiting Great Village
and wanting to see it. Indeed, the summer of 2015 saw Bishop pilgrims from Massachusetts, New York City,
Ireland, France and South Korea visit (and these are
just the ones who connected with me in some way — I am sure there were others
who simply stopped by and took a photograph of themselves on the front step).
For as long as people read Elizabeth Bishop’s poetry and prose, there will a
“common enough” desire to see Great
Village, to see the
places that were so significant in her childhood and in her art, to see this
house.
Elizabeth Bishop House, May 2015 (Photo: Sandra Barry)
**********
Notes:
1. In hindsight, this is the one aspect of the agreement I
would do differently: that is, provision for at least a part-time paid
administrator should have been part of the budget from the beginning. We had no
idea how successful the retreat would become. It may seem puzzling that such a
provision could not be added at any point, that the decision to sell was based
on such a practical and solvable issue. But by the early 2010s, life being
life, it was too late to implement this kind of change because, for the
majority of the owners, the house was no longer a priority.
2. Some might be puzzled by the difficulty we are
encountering selling the house. The reasons are complex and involve issues in
the real estate market in rural Nova
Scotia, the daunting task of taking on a registered
heritage property, the international interest in Bishop that has a direct
impact on the house, and so on. Writer Ellen Brown has explored the pros and
cons of owning a “literary house”: http://www.realtor.com/advice/buy/the-pros-and-cons-of-buying-or-selling-a-literary-home-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment