The final paragraph of Bishop’s letter of 12 August 1961
began with one more complaint about the postal service (something that
resonates quite strongly here right now with the dispute between Canada Post
and CUPW, its union). She noted to her aunt that “the mails are AWFUL — getting
worse all the time.” She reported that “50,000 letter[s] were found hidden in
an abandoned house in Rio — & more on a garbage dump.” Well, things
aren’t that bad in Canada!!
But the backlog of packages from the surge of online shopping ahead of
Christmas is causing great headaches and frustrations on all sides.
Remember that Bishop had made a carbon copy of the letter
she was writing, and was intending to send them both. She wrote: “I’ll put the
check in this one,” and if Grace got “the copy only, I’ll send another
check.” Even the insurance was not much of a guarantee.
Bishop then passed on Lota’s “love and sympathy” and
reported that “she is off to Petrópolis … to pay the bills.” Then another
update on Elizabeth Naudin, whom Bishop had not seen “for ten days or so,” but
she would see her “next week.” Bishop then asked: “Do you know when Mary is
coming?” and urged Grace not to “go to Montreal
[where Mary lived] unless you really feel up to it.” Grace had mentioned
something about Miriam, prompting Bishop to ask for clarification (“What’s the
matter…?”). And then she quickly concluded with, “I must get back to the grind”
of the Brazil book, sending “lots of love” and noting “I think of you all the
time — dreamed about you last night.”
The next day, Sunday, 13 August, Bishop added a postscript.
She reported that “a jet-pilot” she had recently met and who was going to New York, had offered to take her letter and mail it in the
US
“on Monday or Tuesday” — a kind and fast courier (early Fedex!). It was “much
safer” stateside, so she had decided not “to send the carbon.” This saviour
came in for a nice description: “The pilot is amazing — looks just like
Superman!” (By the way, Superman was the co-creation of an American andCanadian.)
After this clarification, Bishop turned to the idea of
seeing Grace when she went to the US
later in the year to work on the Brazil book. She wondered: “Maybe
you’d rather meet me for a day or two in Boston.”
But then she wondered if that might be “too far.” If Grace was going to Montreal, that was a
possibility. All of this was wishful thinking and speculation, so Bishop
returned to “well, let’s wait and see.” It would depend on many things, not the
least of which were “how you feel, where you are, and when I get there,” that
timing was not yet set.
Bishop reiterated, “I do want to see you this trip.” Elizabeth
Naudin had mentioned the possibility of Grace “coming here,” which worried
Bishop: “Much as I’d love to show you around, etc — I can’t honestly
recommend it unless you are feeling absolutely well and tough — and unless I’m
here, too!” She cautioned that “the city will be very hot by then.” As it was,
she was concerned that “Mary & family” might catch “something — or other,
as it is.” She reiterated that “unless one feels up to travelling around I
don’t think it is worth the trip.” And noted that “travelling around is so
complicated here.” She told her aunt that she was “supposed to go to some
places for this book.” Her plane fare would be paid for such research trips,
but as much as Bishop wanted to go to these places, she confessed: “I am scared
of planes, particularly Brazilian planes.” Besides, she didn’t “see how I’m
going to have time,” because “I write so slowly.”
Nothing about these plans were firm on either end, so Bishop
concluded this postscript by urging Grace to “please let me know how you’re
feeling.” She wondered if her aunt would be “staying with Phyllis for a while?”
Something I’m sure she thought would be a good thing. She also had somehow learned
that Aunt Mabel had “apparently … never got that letter I wrote her so long ago
now.” She told her aunt that “sometime I’ll write another” and asked: “has she
cheered up?”
The next letter was just two weeks later, 26 August 1961.
The next post will begin to tackle this quite long epistle.
No comments:
Post a Comment